When it comes to European football, the dispute among the best championships ever played between Italy, Spain and England. Germany a step down. France addirittra not considered. Why? Good question. France is represented by a national of 10 years is a best performance, fueled by youth fields that churn out phenomenal players that are then processed in samples from other leagues. In France, only returning to the national or to spend the summer holidays. This is because the Ligue 1 is not equal, does not include teams of international level and, therefore, is not a good choice for players seeking fame and salary millionaires. France, it is true, it's less of us football fans, rugby has a great result, but still remains a nation of football fans. So why, with the exception of Marseille Tapie, the whole movement has never produced a team capable of winning and confirmed at the European level? Simple, no one is willing to squander fortunes for national football team. The French are also used to make fun of Berlusconi as "thrown away" in football and have never loved and supported Bernard Tapie OM qando did Nua great team. The whole nation seems to find it immoral scialaquo resources and therefore it is not easy for a president to use a club as a springboard for their own lust for easy visibility, or to explore popular consensus. In the words of the British: "Football is a sport practiced by peasants to lords, rugby is a sport practiced by peasants to lords."
JS
0 comments:
Post a Comment